I will solve exam 17. Exam in mathematics

About the exam

The total number of participants in the main period of the Unified State Examination in mathematics at the specialized level in 2018 is more than 391 thousand people. The average test score in 2018 increased by more than 2 test points compared to 2017. The number of exam participants who scored 61 points or more increased over the year from 120.6 thousand to 125.6 thousand. At the same time, the greatest increase was shown by completing tasks with a short answer; tasks with a complete solution were generally completed somewhat worse than in 2017 .

As in previous years, the minimum primary score required to pass the exam was 6 (27 test points). In 2018, 7.48% of exam participants did not achieve the minimum score, in 2017 - 14.35%, this figure almost doubled. The upward trend in results relates to Unified State Exam results both for the country as a whole and for most regions.

More detailed analytical and methodological Unified State Exam materials 2018 available at .

EXAMINATION PLAN FOR THE USE IN MATHEMATICS 2019

Designation of the level of difficulty of the task: B - basic, P - advanced, V - high.

Correspondence between minimum raw scores and 2019 minimum test scores. Order on amendments to Appendix No. 1 to the order of the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science. .

OFFICIAL SCALE 2019

THRESHOLD SCORE
The order of Rosobrnadzor established minimal amount points, confirming that exam participants have mastered the basic general education programs secondary (complete) general education in accordance with the requirements of the federal state educational standard secondary (complete) general education.
MATH THRESHOLD: 6 primary points(27 test points).

EXAMINATION FORMS
You can download the forms in high quality at

The exam program, as in previous years, is composed of materials from the main mathematical disciplines. The tickets will include mathematical, geometric, and algebraic problems.

There are no changes in the KIM Unified State Exam 2020 in mathematics at the profile level.

Features of Unified State Examination tasks in mathematics 2020

• When preparing for the Unified State Exam in mathematics (profile), pay attention to the basic requirements of the examination program. It is designed to test knowledge of an in-depth program: vector and mathematical models, functions and logarithms, algebraic equations and inequalities.
• Separately, practice solving problems in .
• It is important to show innovative thinking.

Exam structure

Unified State Exam assignments specialized mathematics divided into two blocks.

1. Part - short answers, includes 8 problems that test basic mathematical preparation and the ability to apply mathematics knowledge in everyday life.
2. Part - short and detailed answers. It consists of 11 tasks, 4 of which require a short answer, and 7 - a detailed one with arguments for the actions performed.

• Advanced difficulty- tasks 9-17 of the second part of KIM.
• High level of difficulty- tasks 18-19 –. This part of the exam tasks tests not only the level of mathematical knowledge, but also the presence or absence of a creative approach to solving dry “numerical” tasks, as well as the effectiveness of the ability to use knowledge and skills as a professional tool.

Important! Therefore, when preparing for the Unified State Exam, always support your theory in mathematics by solving practical problems.

How will points be distributed?

The tasks of the first part of KIM in mathematics are close to Unified State Exam tests basic level, so it is impossible to score high on them.

The points for each task in mathematics at the profile level were distributed as follows:

• for correct answers to problems No. 1-12 - 1 point;
• No. 13-15 – 2 each;
• No. 16-17 – 3 each;
• No. 18-19 – 4 each.

Duration of the exam and rules of conduct for the Unified State Exam

For execution exam paper-2020 the student is assigned 3 hours 55 minutes(235 minutes).

During this time, the student should not:

• behave noisily;
• use gadgets and others technical means;
• write off;
• try to help others, or ask for help for yourself.

For such actions, the examinee may be expelled from the classroom.

For the state exam in mathematics allowed to bring Bring only a ruler with you; the rest of the materials will be given to you immediately before the Unified State Exam. are issued on the spot.

Effective preparation is the solution online tests in mathematics 2020. Choose and get the maximum score!

Assessment

two parts, including 19 tasks. Part 1 Part 2

3 hours 55 minutes(235 minutes).

Answers

But you can make a compass Calculators on the exam not used.

passport), pass and capillary or! Allowed to take with myself water(in a transparent bottle) and I'm going

The examination paper consists of two parts, including 19 tasks. Part 1 contains 8 tasks of a basic difficulty level with a short answer. Part 2 contains 4 tasks of an increased level of complexity with a short answer and 7 tasks high level Difficulty with a detailed answer.

The exam work in mathematics is allotted 3 hours 55 minutes(235 minutes).

Answers for tasks 1–12 are written down as an integer or finite decimal . Write the numbers in the answer fields in the text of the work, and then transfer them to answer form No. 1, issued during the exam!

When performing work, you can use the ones issued along with the work. Only a ruler is allowed, but it's possible make a compass with your own hands. Do not use tools with markings on them. reference materials. Calculators on the exam not used.

You must have an identification document with you during the exam ( passport), pass and capillary or gel pen with black ink! Allowed to take with myself water(in a transparent bottle) and I'm going(fruit, chocolate, buns, sandwiches), but they may ask you to leave them in the corridor.

• Absolute winner All-Russian competition"Teacher of the Year in Russia - 2007."
• Honorary Education Worker Russian Federation
• Two-time Winner of the competition for the best teachers of the Russian Federation of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
• Member of the Federal Commission for the Development of Testing and Measuring Materials for the Unified State Examination in Mathematics (2009-2010), expert of the Federal Subject Commission of the Unified State Examination in Mathematics (2011-2012, 2013-2014), Deputy Chairman of the Regional Subject Commission of the State Academy of Mathematics in Mathematics 2012-2014 ).

Olga Sergeevna Pyankova, school mathematics teacher, Elekmonar Dear Dmitry Dmitrievich and the team of the “DAEGE” project!
Thank you for creating such a wonderful online resource to help teachers. Now I have the opportunity to conduct lessons, consultations, and additional classes using detailed video lessons. Your lessons are structured competently, thought out to the smallest detail. And the “presence” of Dmitry Dmitrievich in the lesson gives me confidence, makes my lessons more interesting and meaningful. Using tests, notes, and videos, I noticed that the time for preparing for mathematics lessons and consultations was significantly reduced. After all, there is no need to prepare assignments for tests and independent work, compose tests. Just take a ready-made summary for each lesson, homework based on the Unified State Examination task base with a verification system, test papers and use it!!!
Your work is invaluable!!! Thanks again!

Lepikhina Olga Viktorovna, mathematics teacher, Izhevsk I went to the "DAEGE" course, watched several videos, took several tests and a test. Very useful and necessary materials, video tutorials with detailed explanations and most importantly tests with online testing mode. Students like this because they can see the results right away and catch mistakes. It is very useful that before each test there is a review of the tasks and you can watch the video as many times as the student needs - in your own mode. You have a wonderful team that is trying to make the teacher’s work easier and helps the teacher work with all categories of students.

Ksenia Vladimirovna, mathematics teacher, Izhevsk At a quick glance it is very impressive, in terms of volume and quality.
This is a serious help for rural children, as well as for those who are unlucky with a teacher...
very good idea: to be able to buy the activity you are interested in, and not everything
And I'm also pleased with the price....
Thank you!

Maisuradze Victoria Vladimirovna, mathematics teacher, Mezhdurechensk Thank you very much to Dmitry Dmitrievich for everything he does. His website I will solve the Unified State Exam and this resource is a lifesaver when working.
With the current workload, there is absolutely no time to do anything other than check notebooks. Only such resources save. Thank you.

Egorova Victoria Valerievna, mathematics teacher, Elabuga There are no words to express my gratitude. Very, very wonderful material, I would even call it educational and methodological complex. All material is strictly systematized and presented for almost all exam tasks. There is both repetition and necessary theoretical material, And test tasks, and even tests for a block of lessons. I really want to find a place for all this in my lessons.

Nasibullina Zulfiya Salavatovna, mathematics teacher, Maloyaz Having looked through the Daege website, I made sure that here you can solve tests online together with students. I suggested your website and course names to my students. I think that we will actively work with the site. Before this, we actively used the site I will SOLVE the Unified State Exam, I will Solve the OGE. We took tests from there and also solved them online. Thanks to the creators of the site for helping teachers and students, because not everyone has the opportunity to go to courses or study with a tutor.

Anna Karo, student Thanks for this interesting project. Great help!
Especially in last days before the Unified State Exam:) Excellent system for excellent results.

Surina Zoya Petrovna, mathematics teacher, Moscow Dear Colleagues! Thank you for the interesting and informative material.
I consider the preparation course for the Unified State Exam in mathematics accessible, brief, rational and useful.
I hope that solving more complex problems will be understandable and exciting for graduates.

Kultysheva Olga Valerievna, mathematics teacher, Saratov Hello! I have been using your site for several years now, both when preparing for the Unified State Exam in grades 10-11, and when studying topics in grades starting from 5. When I saw that I could sign up for the “DAEGE” course, I decided to try it. I got acquainted with the course. I liked it very much. It would be nice to have this course always at hand. Thank you!

Busova I. I., mathematics teacher, Novosibirsk Good afternoon colleagues!
Wonderful and useful resource!!!
The lessons are carefully worked out, everything is competent, clear, consistent, detailed and clear. Educational material strictly systematized. The course is a huge help for both students and teachers. Thanks a lot!!!

Sergey, many people in education, and not only in education, do not even imagine that our world has many more dimensions than we study in school. If a person is compared to a physical object that has sensors only in three dimensions, then this means that a person is simply far from perfect. I already wrote at the teachers’ council that the current level of knowledge acquired will be a strong constraint on the development of human society. Even the author of quaternions went to his discovery for an extremely long time, and the result from today’s ideas is surprising why he chose this particular path, because there was another path that was more universal and faster. Something similar is happening in education, we are going the most the long way towards the goal, by teaching outdated ideas, we thereby set up fences for ourselves in the future, so that we can then overcome them. Today you can teach mathematics in school so that it makes it possible to perform various transformations that will allow you to get any other triangle from one triangle (I’m even afraid to write more revolutionary things), and then immediately move on to polygons. And then move on to multidimensional space. Those constants that we use to describe known physical fields are determined by parameters that are determined at higher levels (another level of spatial measurement).

It is not clear why school mathematics is divided into 3 branches: geometry, algebra and computer science. After all, they are so closely related; moreover, by dividing mathematics into 3 areas of knowledge, we lose the existing connection between theory and practical activities person. The result we get is the following: we provide knowledge, a significant part of which does not find application in the real activities of people. Such abstractionism kills the desire to learn the real direction of knowledge, its meaning and application in practice. The school curriculum is very far from complete in terms of the practical use of knowledge. The expression has long been known: theory without practice is dead. Are there really people in the leadership of the ministry who do not understand the importance of the practical orientation of knowledge?

“Officials don’t need to explain anything.”
But it is officials who determine the development strategy of the country and education in particular.

The task of the school is not to give knowledge, but to lead schoolchildren to perceive new knowledge through efforts on their part. The school traditionally offers chewed food and offers only one thing - to swallow what is offered. But no one pays attention to the fact that no a large number of connections that would arise if the student himself came to new knowledge. But the teacher’s task is completely different - to lead the student to master new knowledge. Efforts on the part of the learner lead to an increase in the depth of knowledge; a person, gaining speed when mastering new knowledge, by inertia, often goes further than is determined by the program. Today we are in dire need of new educational paradigms. Why do some people remember what they studied for many decades, while others are unable to reproduce what they studied a month ago? The reason is banal: the first knowledge was obtained, and the second was given it, but without movement, weak ties were destroyed, which led to their loss. In pedagogy, it’s time to study the methods of machine learning, artificial intelligence, writing programming languages, then methods will become available for comparing the structures of the organization of thinking, learning and memorization of humans and machines. At the same time, eyes are opened to the peculiarities of perception and mastery of new knowledge, clear criteria appear for choosing optimal development paths educational activities based on in-depth comparative analysis.